• comprar viagra online viagra prix 50 mg viagra cialis generika cialis generico portugal viagra nur mit rezept prix du viagra au luxembourg female viagra 100 mg españa compre ahora commande levitra viagra op doktersrecept viagra in svizzera viagra preis indien miglior offerta per viagra cialis france generique kamagra livraison rapide cialis diario precio
    1. viagra express france achat cialis pas cher en france viagra pharmacie paris achat bviagra bpharmacie acheter viagra en belgique est ce la vrai viagra prix de vente promo viagra tadalafil medicament levitra mg viagra pilule cialis generic belgique achat viagra generique viagra masculin achat cialis belgique achat cialis meilleur prix
    cialis precio oficial 
    cialis achat forum 
    levitra per nachnahme 
    comprar viagra por internet 
    cialis apotheke holland 
    viagra pharmacie prix 
    viagra per nachname bestellen 
    viagra cialis acquisto 
    viagra online ohne rezept 
    pastillas cialis 
    achat viagra en ligne en france 
    viagra generico spedizione rapida 
    viagra billig online bestellen 
    achat viagra generique ssl 
    viagra authentique 

    Toxic Waste & Wasteful Spending


    Photo: nblumhardt

    The nuclear meltdown in Japan has given cause to revaluate the state of our own facilities.  Hanford, in southeast Washington, was the location for the most plutonium production in America during the Cold War.  20 years later, it’s a mess consisting of 53 million gallons of toxic waste.  It will have to endure until 2019 when largest and most expensive nuclear clean up in history is set to commence.  The plan is to spend $74 billion over those next 25 years, more than the annual budget of the Department of Education.

    But something is amiss.  The Department of Energy and The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board seems to be somewhat at odds.  The safety board is investigating whether the DOE may have pressured witnesses in hearing to downplay the risks of the clean-up.  The DOE is pissed that they’re even looking into the matter, citing that the board does not even have the authority to investigate.  The safety concerns seem valid though.  The process of transforming toxic waste into radioactive glass logs could poison the nearby Columbia River.

    Local residents seem to think it’s all good, take your sweet pimp time.  Restaurant owner Leonardo Luzi sums it up rather eloquently saying, “If the government spends more money, it’s good for us.”  True dat; the recession seems to have skipped over the Columbia River region as house valued soared, and job growth was the highest in the country.  It must be nice sucking on the financial teat of the federal government while unemployment plagues the rest of the country.  However if Japan has taught us anything it’s that we need to seek out alternative forms of energy in the post Cold War world.  I’m sure we could find a better way to allocate $74 billion dollars.

    Learn more in the March 19th-25th edition of The Economist

    Stewart Cezar

    written by Stewart Cezar

    Browse other posts by Stewart Cezar »

    One Response to “Toxic Waste & Wasteful Spending”

    1. Hi there! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I really enjoy reading through your posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that cover the same topics? Many thanks!

    Leave a Reply

    Take Our Poll

    What's your biggest environmental concern?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
    A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.
    -Greek Proverb