cialis precio oficial 
cialis achat forum 
levitra per nachnahme 
comprar viagra por internet 
cialis apotheke holland 
viagra pharmacie prix 
viagra per nachname bestellen 
viagra cialis acquisto 
viagra online ohne rezept 
pastillas cialis 
achat viagra en ligne en france 
viagra generico spedizione rapida 
viagra billig online bestellen 
achat viagra generique ssl 
viagra authentique 
cialis 20 compra venta de viagra en españa vendita cialis generico viagra sin receta farmacias andorra vente kamagra belgique viagra generico venda online portugal a san marino viagra senza ricetta generika viagra kaufen viagra thailande foro kamagra contrareembolso farmaco levitra comprar generico viagra acquistare il levitra occorre la prescrizione medica commande viagra viagra coût en france
viagra versandapotheke viagra inde acheter koop viagra online sildenafil on line achete viagra viagra securis a acquisto cialis originale sildenafil en republica dominicana sildenafil citrato generico acheter viagra pas cher comprar viagra al mejor precio consommation viagra france achat cialis 5mg europe cialis viagra a andorre

Toxic Waste & Wasteful Spending


Photo: nblumhardt

The nuclear meltdown in Japan has given cause to revaluate the state of our own facilities.  Hanford, in southeast Washington, was the location for the most plutonium production in America during the Cold War.  20 years later, it’s a mess consisting of 53 million gallons of toxic waste.  It will have to endure until 2019 when largest and most expensive nuclear clean up in history is set to commence.  The plan is to spend $74 billion over those next 25 years, more than the annual budget of the Department of Education.

But something is amiss.  The Department of Energy and The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board seems to be somewhat at odds.  The safety board is investigating whether the DOE may have pressured witnesses in hearing to downplay the risks of the clean-up.  The DOE is pissed that they’re even looking into the matter, citing that the board does not even have the authority to investigate.  The safety concerns seem valid though.  The process of transforming toxic waste into radioactive glass logs could poison the nearby Columbia River.

Local residents seem to think it’s all good, take your sweet pimp time.  Restaurant owner Leonardo Luzi sums it up rather eloquently saying, “If the government spends more money, it’s good for us.”  True dat; the recession seems to have skipped over the Columbia River region as house valued soared, and job growth was the highest in the country.  It must be nice sucking on the financial teat of the federal government while unemployment plagues the rest of the country.  However if Japan has taught us anything it’s that we need to seek out alternative forms of energy in the post Cold War world.  I’m sure we could find a better way to allocate $74 billion dollars.

Learn more in the March 19th-25th edition of The Economist

Stewart Cezar

written by Stewart Cezar

Browse other posts by Stewart Cezar »

One Response to “Toxic Waste & Wasteful Spending”

  1. Hi there! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I really enjoy reading through your posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that cover the same topics? Many thanks!

Leave a Reply

Take Our Poll

If you were all powerful and could save either a forest or a river, which would it be?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.
-Greek Proverb